3 soru · 100 puan
2 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓
2026–2027 · 1. DÖNEM 1. YAZILI
Okulunun seçtiği senaryoyu aç. Önce öğrenci kâğıdını çöz; sonra açıklamalı yanıtlar ve puanlama ölçütleriyle kontrol et.
2 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓3 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓3 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓3 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓3 öğrenci sayfası
Öğrenci PDF’sini aç ↗Soruları ekrandan oku ↓Metni büyütmek veya ekran okuyucuyla çalışmak için senaryonu aç.
Iris: “When I study, words in a song pull my attention away. I prefer a steady, quiet sound without a singer.”
Leo: “For a celebration, I want a strong beat that makes people move. Quiet background music would not create the atmosphere I want.”
Available playlists: acoustic songs with vocals; calm instrumental music; energetic dance music.
Choose the most suitable playlist for Iris and for Leo. For each person, explain your inference with two clues from the comment.
Iris would choose calm instrumental music because she wants no singer/words and a quiet steady sound. Leo would choose energetic dance music because he wants a strong beat and music that makes people move at a celebration.
(1) Melis is the person our class asks to organise shared tasks. (2) She keeps a clear list and checks that nobody has been left out. (3) When plans change, she stays calm and suggests a new order. (4) The first commercial radio broadcasts began many decades ago. (5) Her patience and careful planning help the group finish its work.
Which sentence is irrelevant to this description? Explain why it does not belong, and state the shared focus of the remaining sentences.
Sentence 4 is irrelevant. It gives information about radio history rather than Melis’s character or teamwork. The other sentences describe her organisation, calmness and helpful role in a group.
A school magazine asks: “Which two qualities matter most in a good friend, and why?” You may write your own view or argue from a fictional writer’s perspective. Do not name real friends or reveal private experiences.
Write a short opinion essay of 90–110 words. State your view, develop two qualities in separate supporting sections with a reason and an example for each, consider one possible objection or limit, and end with a conclusion. The examples may be fictional.
Example: I believe honesty and respect are two essential qualities in a good friend. Honesty builds trust because people need reliable information. For example, a friend can admit forgetting an agreed task instead of inventing an excuse. Respect is equally important because friends may have different interests. A respectful friend can accept someone’s decision not to join an activity. Some people worry that honesty always hurts, but truthful comments can be expressed kindly. Friendship does not require agreement on everything. In conclusion, friends strengthen their relationship when they tell the truth with care and respect each other’s choices.
A fictional school surveyed 40 pupils. Each pupil selected ONE preferred music type: pop 18, rock 10, folk 8, classical 4. A separate question allowed several listening situations: travelling 28, studying 16, exercising 12. The survey did not include pupils from other schools.
Which music type was most preferred, and what percentage chose it? Why do the listening-situation counts add up to more than 40? Can the results establish the preferences of all pupils in the city? Explain.
Pop was most preferred: 18 out of 40, or 45%. Listening-situation counts exceed 40 because pupils could choose several situations. The results cannot establish city-wide preferences because only 40 pupils at one school were surveyed.
Fictional survey: 30 members of a school club, one preferred music type each.
Pop: 12; rock: 9; folk: 6; classical: 3.
Separate question: “Where do you usually listen?” Headphones at home: 18; speakers at home: 8; live events: 4. Each member chose one option.
These results describe this club only.
Write a 60–80-word survey report. Identify the group and sample size, compare at least two music preferences, report the most common listening option with its count, and give a conclusion limited to the surveyed club. Do not invent reasons for the choices.
Example: Thirty school-club members completed the music survey. Pop was the most popular type, chosen by twelve members, while nine preferred rock. Folk attracted six votes and classical music three. Eighteen members usually listened through headphones at home, making this the most common listening option. Overall, pop and home headphone listening led the results in this club. The survey does not show why members made these choices or describe other pupils.
(1) Melis is the person our class asks to organise shared tasks. (2) She keeps a clear list and checks that nobody has been left out. (3) When plans change, she stays calm and suggests a new order. (4) The first commercial radio broadcasts began many decades ago. (5) Her patience and careful planning help the group finish its work.
Which sentence is irrelevant to this description? Explain why it does not belong, and state the shared focus of the remaining sentences.
Sentence 4 is irrelevant. It gives information about radio history rather than Melis’s character or teamwork. The other sentences describe her organisation, calmness and helpful role in a group.
A school magazine asks: “Which two qualities matter most in a good friend, and why?” You may write your own view or argue from a fictional writer’s perspective. Do not name real friends or reveal private experiences.
Write a short opinion essay of 90–110 words. State your view, develop two qualities in separate supporting sections with a reason and an example for each, consider one possible objection or limit, and end with a conclusion. The examples may be fictional.
Example: I believe honesty and respect are two essential qualities in a good friend. Honesty builds trust because people need reliable information. For example, a friend can admit forgetting an agreed task instead of inventing an excuse. Respect is equally important because friends may have different interests. A respectful friend can accept someone’s decision not to join an activity. Some people worry that honesty always hurts, but truthful comments can be expressed kindly. Friendship does not require agreement on everything. In conclusion, friends strengthen their relationship when they tell the truth with care and respect each other’s choices.
Iris: “When I study, words in a song pull my attention away. I prefer a steady, quiet sound without a singer.”
Leo: “For a celebration, I want a strong beat that makes people move. Quiet background music would not create the atmosphere I want.”
Available playlists: acoustic songs with vocals; calm instrumental music; energetic dance music.
Choose the most suitable playlist for Iris and for Leo. For each person, explain your inference with two clues from the comment.
Iris would choose calm instrumental music because she wants no singer/words and a quiet steady sound. Leo would choose energetic dance music because he wants a strong beat and music that makes people move at a celebration.
Fictional survey: 30 members of a school club, one preferred music type each.
Pop: 12; rock: 9; folk: 6; classical: 3.
Separate question: “Where do you usually listen?” Headphones at home: 18; speakers at home: 8; live events: 4. Each member chose one option.
These results describe this club only.
Write a 60–80-word survey report. Identify the group and sample size, compare at least two music preferences, report the most common listening option with its count, and give a conclusion limited to the surveyed club. Do not invent reasons for the choices.
Example: Thirty school-club members completed the music survey. Pop was the most popular type, chosen by twelve members, while nine preferred rock. Folk attracted six votes and classical music three. Eighteen members usually listened through headphones at home, making this the most common listening option. Overall, pop and home headphone listening led the results in this club. The survey does not show why members made these choices or describe other pupils.
(1) Melis is the person our class asks to organise shared tasks. (2) She keeps a clear list and checks that nobody has been left out. (3) When plans change, she stays calm and suggests a new order. (4) The first commercial radio broadcasts began many decades ago. (5) Her patience and careful planning help the group finish its work.
Which sentence is irrelevant to this description? Explain why it does not belong, and state the shared focus of the remaining sentences.
Sentence 4 is irrelevant. It gives information about radio history rather than Melis’s character or teamwork. The other sentences describe her organisation, calmness and helpful role in a group.
(1) Yusuf is a thoughtful listener who gives people time to explain their ideas. (2) He asks questions before disagreeing, so his friends feel respected. (3) A standard chessboard has sixty-four squares. (4) Even when he cannot solve a friend’s problem, he offers practical support. (5) These habits make him someone people can trust.
Identify the irrelevant sentence. Explain its mismatch with the paragraph’s purpose. Write one replacement sentence that would strengthen the description without contradicting it.
Sentence 3 is irrelevant because chessboard size does not describe Yusuf’s character or friendships. Example replacement: He remembers what his friends tell him and checks how they are doing later.
A good friend does not have to agree with every decision we make. Constant agreement may hide problems that we need to notice. However, criticism without care can also damage trust. A friend can explain a concern, listen to our response and still respect our final choice. For these reasons, friendship is better supported by honest, respectful discussion than by automatic agreement.
State the author’s main conclusion in your own words. Give two distinct reasons from the text that support it. Does the author recommend controlling a friend’s final decision? Explain.
The author concludes that honest and respectful discussion supports friendship better than always agreeing. Automatic agreement can hide problems, while careless criticism can harm trust. The author does not recommend control; a friend should listen and respect the other person’s final choice.
Iris: “When I study, words in a song pull my attention away. I prefer a steady, quiet sound without a singer.”
Leo: “For a celebration, I want a strong beat that makes people move. Quiet background music would not create the atmosphere I want.”
Available playlists: acoustic songs with vocals; calm instrumental music; energetic dance music.
Choose the most suitable playlist for Iris and for Leo. For each person, explain your inference with two clues from the comment.
Iris would choose calm instrumental music because she wants no singer/words and a quiet steady sound. Leo would choose energetic dance music because he wants a strong beat and music that makes people move at a celebration.
A fictional school surveyed 40 pupils. Each pupil selected ONE preferred music type: pop 18, rock 10, folk 8, classical 4. A separate question allowed several listening situations: travelling 28, studying 16, exercising 12. The survey did not include pupils from other schools.
Which music type was most preferred, and what percentage chose it? Why do the listening-situation counts add up to more than 40? Can the results establish the preferences of all pupils in the city? Explain.
Pop was most preferred: 18 out of 40, or 45%. Listening-situation counts exceed 40 because pupils could choose several situations. The results cannot establish city-wide preferences because only 40 pupils at one school were surveyed.
Fictional survey: 30 members of a school club, one preferred music type each.
Pop: 12; rock: 9; folk: 6; classical: 3.
Separate question: “Where do you usually listen?” Headphones at home: 18; speakers at home: 8; live events: 4. Each member chose one option.
These results describe this club only.
Write a 60–80-word survey report. Identify the group and sample size, compare at least two music preferences, report the most common listening option with its count, and give a conclusion limited to the surveyed club. Do not invent reasons for the choices.
Example: Thirty school-club members completed the music survey. Pop was the most popular type, chosen by twelve members, while nine preferred rock. Folk attracted six votes and classical music three. Eighteen members usually listened through headphones at home, making this the most common listening option. Overall, pop and home headphone listening led the results in this club. The survey does not show why members made these choices or describe other pupils.
(1) Melis is the person our class asks to organise shared tasks. (2) She keeps a clear list and checks that nobody has been left out. (3) When plans change, she stays calm and suggests a new order. (4) The first commercial radio broadcasts began many decades ago. (5) Her patience and careful planning help the group finish its work.
Which sentence is irrelevant to this description? Explain why it does not belong, and state the shared focus of the remaining sentences.
Sentence 4 is irrelevant. It gives information about radio history rather than Melis’s character or teamwork. The other sentences describe her organisation, calmness and helpful role in a group.
(1) Yusuf is a thoughtful listener who gives people time to explain their ideas. (2) He asks questions before disagreeing, so his friends feel respected. (3) A standard chessboard has sixty-four squares. (4) Even when he cannot solve a friend’s problem, he offers practical support. (5) These habits make him someone people can trust.
Identify the irrelevant sentence. Explain its mismatch with the paragraph’s purpose. Write one replacement sentence that would strengthen the description without contradicting it.
Sentence 3 is irrelevant because chessboard size does not describe Yusuf’s character or friendships. Example replacement: He remembers what his friends tell him and checks how they are doing later.
A good friend does not have to agree with every decision we make. Constant agreement may hide problems that we need to notice. However, criticism without care can also damage trust. A friend can explain a concern, listen to our response and still respect our final choice. For these reasons, friendship is better supported by honest, respectful discussion than by automatic agreement.
State the author’s main conclusion in your own words. Give two distinct reasons from the text that support it. Does the author recommend controlling a friend’s final decision? Explain.
The author concludes that honest and respectful discussion supports friendship better than always agreeing. Automatic agreement can hide problems, while careless criticism can harm trust. The author does not recommend control; a friend should listen and respect the other person’s final choice.
Iris: “When I study, words in a song pull my attention away. I prefer a steady, quiet sound without a singer.”
Leo: “For a celebration, I want a strong beat that makes people move. Quiet background music would not create the atmosphere I want.”
Available playlists: acoustic songs with vocals; calm instrumental music; energetic dance music.
Choose the most suitable playlist for Iris and for Leo. For each person, explain your inference with two clues from the comment.
Iris would choose calm instrumental music because she wants no singer/words and a quiet steady sound. Leo would choose energetic dance music because he wants a strong beat and music that makes people move at a celebration.
Noah says, “I enjoy hearing how one instrument sounds on its own. A simple acoustic performance lets me notice small changes in the melody. At a live show, however, I sometimes choose a large band because I like sharing its energy with the crowd. My choice depends on why I am listening.”
Infer Noah’s likely choice for careful listening alone and for an energetic live event. Explain why describing him as someone who “only likes quiet music” would be inaccurate.
For careful listening alone, he would likely choose a simple acoustic/solo performance to notice the instrument and melody. For an energetic live event, he may choose a large band. “Only likes quiet music” is inaccurate because he also enjoys the energy of a band with a crowd; his preference changes with purpose.
A fictional school surveyed 40 pupils. Each pupil selected ONE preferred music type: pop 18, rock 10, folk 8, classical 4. A separate question allowed several listening situations: travelling 28, studying 16, exercising 12. The survey did not include pupils from other schools.
Which music type was most preferred, and what percentage chose it? Why do the listening-situation counts add up to more than 40? Can the results establish the preferences of all pupils in the city? Explain.
Pop was most preferred: 18 out of 40, or 45%. Listening-situation counts exceed 40 because pupils could choose several situations. The results cannot establish city-wide preferences because only 40 pupils at one school were surveyed.
Fictional survey: 30 members of a school club, one preferred music type each.
Pop: 12; rock: 9; folk: 6; classical: 3.
Separate question: “Where do you usually listen?” Headphones at home: 18; speakers at home: 8; live events: 4. Each member chose one option.
These results describe this club only.
Write a 60–80-word survey report. Identify the group and sample size, compare at least two music preferences, report the most common listening option with its count, and give a conclusion limited to the surveyed club. Do not invent reasons for the choices.
Example: Thirty school-club members completed the music survey. Pop was the most popular type, chosen by twelve members, while nine preferred rock. Folk attracted six votes and classical music three. Eighteen members usually listened through headphones at home, making this the most common listening option. Overall, pop and home headphone listening led the results in this club. The survey does not show why members made these choices or describe other pupils.
(1) Melis is the person our class asks to organise shared tasks. (2) She keeps a clear list and checks that nobody has been left out. (3) When plans change, she stays calm and suggests a new order. (4) The first commercial radio broadcasts began many decades ago. (5) Her patience and careful planning help the group finish its work.
Which sentence is irrelevant to this description? Explain why it does not belong, and state the shared focus of the remaining sentences.
Sentence 4 is irrelevant. It gives information about radio history rather than Melis’s character or teamwork. The other sentences describe her organisation, calmness and helpful role in a group.
(1) Yusuf is a thoughtful listener who gives people time to explain their ideas. (2) He asks questions before disagreeing, so his friends feel respected. (3) A standard chessboard has sixty-four squares. (4) Even when he cannot solve a friend’s problem, he offers practical support. (5) These habits make him someone people can trust.
Identify the irrelevant sentence. Explain its mismatch with the paragraph’s purpose. Write one replacement sentence that would strengthen the description without contradicting it.
Sentence 3 is irrelevant because chessboard size does not describe Yusuf’s character or friendships. Example replacement: He remembers what his friends tell him and checks how they are doing later.
Özgün yazılı hazırlık sorularıdır. Resmî sınav soruları değildir. Bazı sorular farklı senaryolarda tekrar kullanılır; senaryolar birbirinden bağımsız denemeler olarak değerlendirilmemelidir.